[Solved] Follow Button issue [closed]

The “follow” button is meant to be used for personal accounts, e.g. to follow status updates of a user on Facebook. What I think you are looking for is the “Like” button, which is meant to allow people to show their interest in a page, which is what your site on Facebook is. An example … Read more

[Solved] How to scrape multiple result having same tags and class

You need to parse your data from the script tag rather than the spans and divs. Try this: import requests from bs4 import BeautifulSoup import re import pandas as pd from pandas import json_normalize import json def get_page(url): response = requests.get(url) if not response.ok: print(‘server responded:’, response.status_code) else: soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, ‘lxml’) return soup def … Read more

[Solved] I am getting segmentation fault for merge sort [closed]

That would be a way to go on Linux: Compile your program with debug info (g++ -g merger_sort.cpp -o merger_sort) Load it in debuger: >>> gdb merge_sort Run it: (gdb) run. You will see: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000400b1e in merge_sort (A=0x7ffffffddda0, p=0, r=1) look at the position in the code: (gdb) layout … Read more

[Solved] disable buttons permanently throughout the aplication in android

define the behavior in SharePreferences: for example use this in onResume: SharedPreferences pref = PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(context); boolean enabled = pref.getBoolean(“isEnabled”,true); myButton.setEnabled(enabled); in onClick event of the button do this: SharedPreferences pref = PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(context); pref.edit().putBoolean(“isEnabled”,false).commit(); myButton.setEnabled(false); 2 solved disable buttons permanently throughout the aplication in android

[Solved] Can you determine the terminating boolean expression of a for loop dynamically?

You can replace the condition in a loop with a delegate. Something like this works: int i = 0; Func<bool> predicate = () => i < 5; for (; predicate(); ++i) Console.WriteLine(i); Just assign a different delegate to predicate if you want a different condition. EDIT: This might be a clearer example: Func<int, bool> countToFive … Read more

[Solved] How to get rails_blob_url for the avatar attached to User Model from Userspublication?

Thank you for the help guys (specially @arieljuod) i figured out the answer it was pretty simple : return rails_blob_path(object.user.avatar, only_path: true) Here object is of Userspublication! (The guy who down voted this question if you cant answer and can’t even bother to help in understanding whats wrong with it “suck it”!!) solved How to … Read more

[Solved] Why exactly can’t function pointers be implicitly converted?

There are implicit and explicit conversions. A cast is always an explicit conversion and uses the (type) cast operator. C has quite decent type safety when it comes to pointers. Apart from the special case of null pointer conversions, the only implicit pointer conversion allowed is between an object pointer and a pointer to void. … Read more

[Solved] Permutation programming challenge (Java)

Here is a simple solution of your problem, you have a problem in your 3ed loop, you don’t need it! You just need to loop through your start(i) and end(j) indices as shown below: public static void main(String[] args) { String search_query = “one two three”; String[] queries = search_query.split(” “); List<String> liste = new … Read more

[Solved] Creating an initializer list in C [closed]

struct S { int a, d, p; }; #define S_INITIALIZER { 12, 10, 77 } struct S s = S_INITIALIZER; You (typically) provide a value for each member. If you provide less, the remaining members are zero-initialized (C99, 6.7.8.21). If you provide more, you will get a compiler warning and the additional initializer values are … Read more

[Solved] Is it a good practise to remove a function instead of making it stay there with a deprecated annotation [closed]

This maybe might be something for Programmers. If you were making a library used by others, a new version should not break existing code. Only after a major revision, say from 3.8.7 to 4.0 you might require the users to recode. Mind that other bug repairs might make a branching, a back porting to a … Read more