[Solved] Why doesn’t “return x.a;” signal an error? [duplicate]

Introduction

When writing code in JavaScript, it is important to understand why certain statements do not signal an error. One such statement is “return x.a;”. This statement does not signal an error because it is a valid syntax in JavaScript. In this article, we will discuss why this statement does not signal an error and how it can be used in code.

Solution

The code “return x.a;” does not signal an error because it is valid syntax. The code is attempting to return the value of the property “a” of the object “x”. If the object “x” does not have a property “a”, then the code will return “undefined”. However, this does not cause an error, as it is a valid return value.


but I don’t understand why “return x.a;” doesn’t signal an error

return x.a is valid because x is accessible as a local variable inside the static method and is an instance of A. a is an instance property on the instance of A so x.a is perfectly valid.

solved Why doesn’t “return x.a;” signal an error? [duplicate]


The reason why “return x.a;” does not signal an error is because JavaScript is a loosely typed language. This means that it does not require the programmer to explicitly declare the type of a variable before using it. In this case, the variable x could be an object, and the property a could be a valid property of that object. Therefore, the statement “return x.a;” is valid and does not signal an error.

In a strongly typed language, such as Java, the statement “return x.a;” would signal an error because the type of the variable x would need to be declared before it could be used. If the type of x was not declared, then the compiler would not know if the property a was valid for that type.

In summary, “return x.a;” does not signal an error in JavaScript because it is a loosely typed language and does not require the programmer to explicitly declare the type of a variable before using it.