If a is an int variable, is it always true that *&a == a ?
It should be, but I can’t find a definitive statement to that effect.
If p is an int* variable, is it always true that p == &*p ?
Yes – in that case, neither the & nor * operators are actually evaluated. See the online draft of the C 2011 standard, §
6.5.3.2 ¶ 3.
Is it ever meaningful to say **p ?
Yes. Multiple indirection shows up all over the place. You can have pointers to pointers, pointers to pointers to pointers, pointers to arrays of pointers, pointers to functions returning pointers to arrays of pointers to pointers to pointers, etc.
Is it ever meaningful to say &&a ?
No. The result of &a is not an lvalue, so you cannot apply the & operator to it. To put it another way, what’s the address of an address?
After assigning a = 2 and p = &a, how much is *p**p ?
Should be the same as a * a, although be aware that C’s tokenizing algorithm is “greedy”, so you really want to separate terms and operators with whitespace.
If furthermore q = &p, how much is **q**p***q ?
Again, it should be the same as a * a * a, and again, be aware of how C tokenizes expressions.
3
solved Pointer and address in C [closed]